To write a book review, briefly summarize the book's argument, then spend most of your words evaluating how well the author achieves their aim, with specific evidence from the text. The evaluation is what makes it a review.
This page sets out the structure, what to look for while reading, how to judge a book fairly and a worked example you can compare with your own draft.
The Four Parts of an Academic Book Review
- Introduction: author, title, subject and your overall verdict.
- Summary: the book's main argument and scope, kept short.
- Evaluation: strengths and weaknesses with specific examples. This is the bulk of the review.
- Conclusion: your final judgment and who would benefit from the book.
Review, Report or Summary?
Three tasks are often confused. Knowing which one your tutor wants saves you from writing the wrong thing.
| Task | What it does | Typical level |
|---|---|---|
| Summary | Restates the content neutrally | Any, often as a short exercise |
| Book report | Describes the book and the reader's response | School |
| Academic book review | Summarizes briefly, then critically evaluates argument, evidence and contribution | University |
Book Review Structure
| Section | What to include | Share of length |
|---|---|---|
| Introduction | Full reference details, the book's subject and aim, your thesis about the book | About 10 percent |
| Summary | Central argument, scope, method and organization | About 20 to 25 percent |
| Evaluation | Argument, evidence, contribution and execution, each with examples | About 55 to 60 percent |
| Conclusion | Overall verdict and recommended readers | About 10 percent |
Some reviews blend summary and evaluation section by section, especially for edited collections. That is fine, as long as evaluation still dominates.
How to Write a Book Review, Step by Step
- Check the brief. Note the length, the required focus and whether you must compare the book with other works.
- Read with questions. What is the author's thesis? Who is the audience? What evidence supports the argument?
- Take notes with page numbers. Mark strong passages, weak claims and examples you might quote.
- Decide your verdict. Write one sentence summarizing your judgment. This is your thesis.
- Write a short summary. Give a reader who has not read the book enough to follow your evaluation.
- Write the evaluation. Organize it by criteria, each with evidence from the text.
- Conclude with a recommendation. Say who will find the book useful and why.
- Revise and cite. Check quotations, page numbers and the citation style.
What to Evaluate
Strong reviews judge the book on substance, not taste. Use these four criteria as a starting point.
- Argument: is the thesis clear and well defended?
- Evidence: is it sufficient, current and used fairly?
- Contribution: does the book add something to its field, or restate what is known?
- Execution: is it well organized and clearly written for its audience?
Judge the book against what the author set out to do, not against the book you wish they had written. Acknowledge strengths alongside weaknesses: all praise reads as a blurb, and all attack reads as unfair.
For a scholarly book, place it in context. Comparing it with other key works shows you know the field and lifts the review from competent to authoritative.
Fiction and Non-Fiction
For non-fiction, focus on argument, evidence and contribution. For a novel, evaluate how well elements such as character, structure, style and theme serve the work's apparent aims, and support each point with a short passage. In both cases, avoid giving away more plot than your evaluation needs.
Example Book Review Excerpt
Introduction. In The Sixth Extinction (2014), Elizabeth Kolbert argues that human activity is driving a mass extinction comparable to the five great die-offs in Earth's history. The book succeeds as an accessible synthesis of current science, though its reportage-led structure leaves the policy implications underdeveloped.
Evaluation paragraph. Kolbert's greatest strength is her method. Each chapter follows one species and the scientists studying it, so abstract processes such as ocean acidification become concrete and memorable. However, this episodic structure also limits the book's analysis. Because each chapter ends with the species rather than the system, readers are left with vivid cases but little guidance on which human activities matter most or how they might be reduced.
Notice the pattern: a claim about the book, a specific example and an explanation of why it matters. The excerpt also balances a strength with a limitation.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Summarizing the whole book and forgetting to evaluate it.
- Judging on personal taste rather than evidence from the text.
- Vague praise or criticism with no specific examples.
- Reviewing the book you wish existed rather than the one the author wrote.
- Ending without a clear verdict or recommendation.
Book Review Checklist
- The introduction gives author, title and a clear verdict.
- The summary is short and accurate.
- Evaluation takes up most of the review.
- Every judgment is supported by an example or page reference.
- Strengths and weaknesses are both acknowledged.
- The conclusion recommends the book to a specific audience.
- Citations follow the required style.
How EssayDonkey Helps with Book Reviews
Send the book's details, your brief and the citation style. A writer matched to your subject writes a custom book review with a concise summary and a balanced, well-evidenced evaluation, written from scratch and plagiarism-checked.
Use it as a reference for structure and critical voice. Free revisions within the scope of your original request are included.
Want a Custom Book Review to Learn From?
Send the book, the brief and your citation style. Your writer builds a custom review with a short summary and a well-evidenced evaluation.
Order Your Book ReviewFree revisions · Full refund if late · Written from scratch for your order
Frequently Asked Questions
A book report mainly describes the book and the reader's response. An academic book review critically evaluates its argument, evidence and contribution, and reaches a reasoned judgment.
Only a small part, often around a fifth to a quarter. Most of the review should be evaluation.
Yes, as a reasoned judgment grounded in evidence from the text, not a statement of taste.
Use a few short ones to support specific points, with page numbers. Most of the review should be in your own words.
It varies. Many university book reviews are 800 to 1,500 words. Follow your brief.
Not always. Scholarly reviews often compare the book with other works, so check whether your brief asks for this.
Many tutors accept "I" sparingly in a review, since it is an evaluative piece. If your brief asks for an impersonal style, phrase judgments as claims about the book instead.