Paper Type

How to Write a Literature Review

Search and select sources, organize them by theme, write synthesis instead of summary and identify the gap your research fills, with a structure table and worked example.

Updated October 2026 · 5 min read

To write a literature review, search systematically for relevant research, evaluate it, group it by theme and write a synthesis that shows what is known, where studies disagree and what gap remains.

A literature review is an argument about the state of knowledge, not a list of summaries. It may be a standalone assignment or a chapter in a dissertation, thesis or research paper. This page covers types of review, searching, evaluating, structuring, synthesis, finding the gap and a checklist.

The Six Steps of a Literature Review

  1. Define a focused question and scope.
  2. Search databases systematically and record your search terms.
  3. Screen and evaluate sources for relevance and quality.
  4. Group findings into themes or debates.
  5. Write each theme as a synthesis, comparing and evaluating studies.
  6. Conclude with the gap your research or question addresses.

What a Literature Review Is and Is Not

A literature review critically discusses published research on a topic. It shows the main findings, the methods used, where studies agree and disagree, and what is still unknown.

It is not an annotated bibliography, which treats sources one by one. It is not a summary of everything ever written on the topic. And it is not a place for your own new data; that belongs in your results.

Types of Literature Review

TypeWhat it doesWhere you meet it
Narrative (traditional)Discusses key research thematically, selected by the authorEssays, dissertation chapters
SystematicUses a predefined protocol to find and appraise all relevant studiesHealth sciences, postgraduate research
ScopingMaps the extent and type of research in a fieldNew or broad topics
IntegrativeCombines different study designs to build a fuller pictureNursing and social sciences

Most undergraduate and taught master's reviews are narrative, but many still expect a transparent search strategy. Check your brief.

A good search is planned. Break your question into key concepts and list synonyms for each.

  • Databases: use subject databases such as PubMed or CINAHL for health, PsycINFO for psychology, and Scopus or Web of Science for wider searches.
  • Boolean operators: combine terms with AND, OR and NOT, for example ("remote work" OR telework) AND productivity.
  • Limits: set date ranges, languages and publication types that fit your scope.
  • Citation chasing: check the reference lists of key articles and see who has cited them since.
  • A search log: record databases, terms, dates and results so you can describe your method.

Evaluating Sources

For each study, ask who wrote it, where it was published, how it was designed, how large the sample was and whether the conclusions follow from the data. Peer review is a starting point, not a guarantee of quality.

Organize by Theme, Not by Source

The single biggest improvement most reviews need is to stop discussing one source per paragraph. Instead, group studies by theme, debate, method or chronology.

A simple way to find themes is a synthesis matrix: a table with sources as rows and key questions as columns.

SourceSettingMethodEffect on productivityExplanation offered
Study ACall centerField experimentIncreaseFewer interruptions
Study BTech firmSurveyMixedCollaboration costs
Study CPublic sectorInterviewsDecrease for new staffLess informal learning

Reading down the columns reveals patterns: here, effects seem to depend on task type and staff experience. Those patterns become your themes. The studies in the table are illustrative.

Structure of a Literature Review

SectionWhat it does
IntroductionDefines the topic and scope, explains why it matters and how the review is organized
Method (if required)Databases, search terms, inclusion and exclusion criteria
Thematic sectionsEach theme synthesizes and evaluates the relevant studies
Gap and conclusionSummarizes what is known, what is contested and what is missing

Writing Synthesis Instead of Summary

Synthesis means discussing several studies together: showing where they agree, where they differ and why. Compare these two versions.

Summary: Study A found that remote work increased productivity. Study B surveyed tech workers and found mixed results. Study C interviewed public sector staff and found productivity fell for new employees.

Synthesis: Evidence on remote work and productivity is mixed, and the differences appear to depend on the type of work and the employee's experience. Gains are clearest in routine, individual tasks such as call handling (Study A), while collaborative and learning-intensive roles show weaker or negative effects (Studies B and C). Because Study B relied on self-report, its findings may also reflect perceptions rather than measured output.

The synthesis makes a claim, groups studies to support it and evaluates a method. That is what "critical" means in a literature review.

Identifying the Gap

The gap is what the existing research has not yet answered. It might be a population not studied, a method not used, a contradiction not resolved or a recent change not yet examined. End your review by stating it clearly, because it justifies your research question.

Literature Review Checklist

  • The scope and question are stated in the introduction.
  • Your search is described if the brief requires it.
  • Sections are organized by theme, not by source.
  • Each paragraph discusses several studies together.
  • Methods and limitations of key studies are evaluated.
  • Agreements, disagreements and reasons are explained.
  • The conclusion identifies a clear gap.
  • Every source is cited and in the reference list.

How EssayDonkey Helps with Literature Reviews

Send your topic or research question, scope, date range, required number and type of sources, and your citation style. A writer matched to your subject prepares a custom literature review that synthesizes the research by theme and identifies the gap, written from scratch and checked for plagiarism.

Use it for study and reference as you write your own review. Free revisions within your brief are included.

Want a Custom Literature Review to Learn From?

Send your topic, scope, source requirements and style. Your writer prepares a custom review that synthesizes the research and identifies the gap.

Order Your Literature Review

Free revisions · Full refund if late · Written from scratch for your order

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is a literature review?

It depends on the project. In a dissertation it is often 20 to 30 percent of the total; a standalone review follows its own word count.

How many sources should a literature review include?

Enough to represent the main research on your question. Undergraduate reviews may use 15 to 30 sources; postgraduate reviews often use more. Follow your brief.

How recent should sources be?

Many briefs ask for sources from the last five to ten years, but include older landmark studies where they are still central.

Can I use first person in a literature review?

Some disciplines allow it for describing your search or approach. Check your department's guidance.

What is the difference between a literature review and an annotated bibliography?

An annotated bibliography discusses each source separately. A literature review synthesizes sources by theme into an argument.

How do I find the research gap?

Look for questions studies leave open, populations or settings not studied, conflicting findings and limitations authors themselves name.